Referential Status – ZE12
Validation status: Validated
ZE12 Referential Status
Subclass of:
Superclass of:
Scope note:
An instance of referential status is the collective ascription of a referential relationship between a propositional object and some entity by a community. The substance of the referential status is the communal recognition of the ascribed referential relation holding between the propositional object and the entity in question.
Instances of referential status are recognizable through evidence of community members adopting the intentional stance and behaviour indicated as properly holding between the propositional object and the object it is taken to refer to in the manner it is meant to refer, as observable from direct witnesses, through the reports of competent observers or through evidence of a declarative act initiating this status.
Instances of referential status may come to be through a formal process such as a declarative act or may have arisen through habit, fiat or be of unknown origin. Instances of referential status may end either though a formal process, or may simply fade out, be eliminated by fiat or for unknown reasons.
Examples:
- The referential status of the visual appearance of wearing a balaclava (E36) as ‘refers to’ "military identity" (E55) as "appropriated" (E55) February 1967 holds for members of the anarchist group Black Mask (E74) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_bloc)
- The referential status of 'Let's Go, Brandon' (E89) as 'refers to' Joe Biden (E21) as "anti-Joe Biden sentiment" (E55) 2 October 2021 - Present holds for members of the American Polity (E74) (https://apnews.com/article/lets-go-brandon-what-does-it-mean-republicans-joe-biden-ab13db212067928455a3dba07756a160)
- The referential status of the visual appearance of wearing a balaclava (E36) as ‘refers to’ "military identity" (E55) as "appropriated" (E55) February 1967 holds for members of the anarchist group Black Mask (E74) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_bloc)
- The referential status of 'Let's Go, Brandon' (E89) as 'refers to' Joe Biden (E21) as "anti-Joe Biden sentiment" (E55) 2 October 2021 - Present holds for members of the American Polity (E74) (https://apnews.com/article/lets-go-brandon-what-does-it-mean-republicans-joe-biden-ab13db212067928455a3dba07756a160)
In First Order Logic:
- ZE12(x) ⇒ ZE1(x)
- ZE12(x) ⇒ ZE1(x)
Outgoing properties:
- aaao:ZP35 has referential subject (is referential subject of) → crm:E89 Propositional Object
- aaao:ZP35 has referential subject (is referential subject of) → crm:E89 Propositional Object
- aaao:ZP36 ascribes referent (is referent ascribed by) → crm:E1 CRM Entity
- aaao:ZP36 ascribes referent (is referent ascribed by) → crm:E1 CRM Entity
- aaao:ZP37 ascribes referential relation (is referential relation ascribed by) → crm:E55 Type
- aaao:ZP37 ascribes referential relation (is referential relation ascribed by) → crm:E55 Type
- aaao:ZP38 ascribes referential mode (is referential mode ascribed by) → crm:E55 Type
- aaao:ZP38 ascribes referential mode (is referential mode ascribed by) → crm:E55 Type
- aaao:ZP35 has referential subject (is referential subject of) → crm:E89 Propositional Object
- aaao:ZP36 ascribes referent (is referent ascribed by) → crm:E1 CRM Entity
- aaao:ZP37 ascribes referential relation (is referential relation ascribed by) → crm:E55 Type
- aaao:ZP38 ascribes referential mode (is referential mode ascribed by) → crm:E55 Type
Scope notes
Show | Scope note | Language | Namespace | View details | Comments | Validation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
An instance of referential status is the collective ascription of a referential relationship between a propositional object and some entity by a community. The substance of the referential status is the communal recognition of the ascribed referential relation holding between the propositional object and the entity in question. Instances of referential status are recognizable through evidence of community members adopting the intentional stance and behaviour indicated as properly holding between the propositional object and the object it is taken to refer to in the manner it is meant to refer, as observable from direct witnesses, through the reports of competent observers or through evidence of a declarative act initiating this status. Instances of referential status may come to be through a formal process such as a declarative act or may have arisen through habit, fiat or be of unknown origin. Instances of referential status may end either though a formal process, or may simply fade out, be eliminated by fiat or for unknown reasons. | en | Art and Architectural Argumentation Ontology Version 1.6 | 0 | Validated | ||
An instance of referential status is the collective ascription of a referential relationship between a propositional object and some entity by a community. The substance of the referential status is the communal recognition of the ascribed referential relation holding between the propositional object and the entity in question. Instances of referential status are recognizable through evidence of community members adopting the intentional stance and behaviour indicated as properly holding between the propositional object and the object it is taken to refer to in the manner it is meant to refer, as observable from direct witnesses, through the reports of competent observers or through evidence of a declarative act initiating this status. Instances of referential status may come to be through a formal process such as a declarative act or may have arisen through habit, fiat or be of unknown origin. Instances of referential status may end either though a formal process, or may simply fade out, be eliminated by fiat or for unknown reasons. | en | Art and Architectural Argumentation Ontology Version 1.6 ongoing | 0 | Validated |
Examples
Show | Example | Language | Namespace | View details | Comments | Validation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The referential status of the visual appearance of wearing a balaclava (E36) as ‘refers to’ "military identity" (E55) as "appropriated" (E55) February 1967 holds for members of the anarchist group Black Mask (E74) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_bloc) The referential status of 'Let's Go, Brandon' (E89) as 'refers to' Joe Biden (E21) as "anti-Joe Biden sentiment" (E55) 2 October 2021 - Present holds for members of the American Polity (E74) (https://apnews.com/article/lets-go-brandon-what-does-it-mean-republicans-joe-biden-ab13db212067928455a3dba07756a160) | en | Art and Architectural Argumentation Ontology Version 1.6 | 0 | Validated | ||
The referential status of the visual appearance of wearing a balaclava (E36) as ‘refers to’ "military identity" (E55) as "appropriated" (E55) February 1967 holds for members of the anarchist group Black Mask (E74) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_bloc) The referential status of 'Let's Go, Brandon' (E89) as 'refers to' Joe Biden (E21) as "anti-Joe Biden sentiment" (E55) 2 October 2021 - Present holds for members of the American Polity (E74) (https://apnews.com/article/lets-go-brandon-what-does-it-mean-republicans-joe-biden-ab13db212067928455a3dba07756a160) | en | Art and Architectural Argumentation Ontology Version 1.6 ongoing | 0 | Validated |
Additional notes
Show | Notes | Type | Language | Namespace | View details | Comments | Validation |
---|
Identifier: ZE12
Official URI: https://ontology.swissartresearch.net/aaao/ZE12_Referential_Status
OntoME URI: https://ontome.net/ontology/c750
Labels
Label | Language | Last updated | View details | Comments | Validation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Referential Status | en | 2023-10-31 | 0 | Validated | |
Referential Status | en | 2024-11-26 | 0 | Validated |
* : Standard label for this language
Namespace
Namespace | Last updated |
---|---|
Art and Architectural Argumentation Ontology Version 1.6 | 2024-11-26 |
CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5.4 | 2024-06-24 |
CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 | 2023-10-31 |
Art and Architectural Argumentation Ontology Version 1.6 ongoing | 2020-09-18 |
Parent classes
Class | Class namespace | Relation defined in | Justification | View details | Edit | Delete | Comments | Validation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZE1 Institutional Fact | Art and Architectural Argumentation Ontology Version 1.6 ongoing | Art and Architectural Argumentation Ontology Version 1.6 ongoing |
|
0 | Validated | |||
ZE1 Institutional Fact | Art and Architectural Argumentation Ontology Version 1.6 | Art and Architectural Argumentation Ontology Version 1.6 | 0 | Validated |
Ancestor classes
Class | Depth | Class namespace | Via |
---|---|---|---|
E1 CRM Entity | 3 | CIDOC CRM version 7.1.3 | ZE1 - E2 |
E1 CRM Entity | 3 | CIDOC CRM version 7.1.3 | ZE1 - E2 |
E1 CRM Entity | 3 | CIDOC CRM version 7.1.3 | ZE1 - E2 |
E1 CRM Entity | 3 | CIDOC CRM version 7.1.3 | ZE1 - E2 |
E2 Temporal Entity | 2 | CIDOC CRM version 7.1.3 | ZE1 |
E2 Temporal Entity | 2 | CIDOC CRM version 7.1.3 | ZE1 |
E2 Temporal Entity | 2 | CIDOC CRM version 7.1.3 | ZE1 |
E2 Temporal Entity | 2 | CIDOC CRM version 7.1.3 | ZE1 |
Thing | 4 | OntoME internal model - active version | ZE1 - E2 - E1 |
Thing | 4 | OntoME internal model - active version | ZE1 - E2 - E1 |
Thing | 4 | OntoME internal model - active version | ZE1 - E2 - E1 |
Thing | 4 | OntoME internal model - active version | ZE1 - E2 - E1 |
Child and descendant classes
Class | Depth | Class namespace | Via |
---|---|---|---|
ZE56 Witness Status | 1 | Art and Architectural Argumentation Ontology Version 1.6 ongoing |
Related classes
Relation | Class | Class namespace | Justification | Relation defined in | View details | Edit | Delete | Comments | Validation |
---|
Outgoing properties (this class is domain)
Outgoing properties (inherited from ancestors)
Incoming properties (this class is range)
Domain | Property identifier | Range | Namespace |
---|
Incoming properties (inherited from ancestors)
Profiles using this class
Label | Version | Status | Last updated |
---|
Linked classes graph
Use mouse wheel to zoom in/out.
Comments
No comment found.