CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5

CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5

Description:

This document represents the formal specification for an unofficial formal extension of the CIDOC CRM designed for application in the area of art and architectural historical research. The scope of this extension is to support art and architectural research in the sense of the study of primary and secondary documents for the derivation, manually and programmatically, of historically contextual facts that can be used to support reflection and structured argumentation. The core expressivity that this extension adds is the ability to accurately express historically bound, contextual social facts relative to the agents holding those beliefs and the temporal period for which those beliefs were valid. The extension enables this expressivity by introducing the notions of institutional fact and speech act as core modelling concepts. Institutional facts are collective beliefs about the world held by groups for a period of time. Such collective beliefs while subjectively grounded are epistemically objective for the community over which they hold sway. Introducing the notion of institutional fact allows for a specialization of the core CRM to be able to express these social realities (expressed in simple, aoristic binary properties in the core CRM) in their full social complexity as temporally and socially bound beliefs. The concomitant core notion introduced in this extension is the idea of Speech Act in the Austinian and Serlean sense. A speech act is a kind of intentional event (E7 Activity of CRM base) in which agents purposefully apply a rule and perform a set practice in order to bring about a new social state or institutional fact. Introducing the notion of speech act provides both a high level ontological category and set of relations for describing the kinds of events which are the cause of institutional facts as well as providing a starting point for the analysis of the non truth propositional use of information objects. In speech acts, information objects (e.g. phrases and formulae) are deployed not to convey states of the world but to generate states of the world. The subject of historical investigation is not simply the bare facts available to an empirical analysis of the physical world but involves an investigation of the social activities which generated contexts of understanding and belief that may differ significantly across times and peoples. Materializing the social facts implicit in CRM base as explicit institutional facts gives them a richer ontological representation and offers a consistent epistemological approach to their study by recognizing social, negotiated facts as objective realities in themselves and treating them as first order entities of study. This involves a departure from the aims of CRM base which is guided by an information integration functionality which favours the representation of the latest state of knowledge in a presentist perspective. In the study of the history of art and architecture it is in no small part the different non-coinciding facts held or supported by different actors over different times which are of interest. The materialization of institutional facts supports the information management functionality which guides this informal extension of the CIDOC CRM and which aims to support historians in representing the positive knowledge they can gather from primary and secondary sources of evidence of both past simple and institutional facts for the purposes of proposing hypotheses and analyses of texts, authors, periods, works and so on. In this regard, CRMaaa also provides an initial limited set of classes for describing traditional and digital methods of deriving facts from texts, in order to support the linking of contemporary research processes as provenance nodes for the different data points of simple and institutional facts which they generate in the course of their research.

With this in mind, examples have been chosen which potentially support a variety of social facts. Some of these facts, i.e., those held by one group of people at some time or other, may directly contradict another, i.e., that held by a different group of people at some potentially different time. Most of the examples have been reused across different types of social fact, in order to tell more completely the history of the objects in question and the beliefs that have been held about them by specific groups of people over a given period of time. These histories can in themselves be quite complex. References are thus provided for further contextualization. These appear in brackets following the examples, like so:

  • The Ownership Status (ZE8) of the Gʼpsgolox totem pole (E22) as 'has current owner' the Haisla people (E74) from 1872 - 2012 holds for the Haisla people (E74) and as 'has current owner' the Swedish National Museum of Ethnography (E74) from 1929 - 2006 holds for the Swedish Polity. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%CA%BCpsgolox_totem_pole)

This unofficial extension of the CIDOC CRM is formulated in relation to:

  • CIDOC CRM v.7.1.2
  • CIDOC CRM Dig v.4.0

The specification consists of a set of declarations for formalized classes and properties that extend the CIDOC CRM and the above official extensions. 

Adopting the conventions of the CIDOC CRM each class and property have been given an identifier in addition to their names. The naming convention adopted for this extension is:

ZE = class

ZP = property

The choice of these names was arbitrary, making a conceptual connection with the official CRM representation while clearly distinguishing the new classes and properties from those of either CRM base or its official extensions.

Status:

Published

Contributors:

George Bruseker, Denitsa Nenova, Matthew Fielding

Version:

1.5

Description

Show Description Language Namespace
This document represents the formal specification for an unofficial formal extension of the CIDOC CRM designed for application in the area of art and architectural historical research. The scope of this extension is to support art and architectural research in the sense of the study of primary and secondary documents for the derivation, manually and programmatically, of historically contextual facts that can be used to support reflection and structured argumentation. The core expressivity that this extension adds is the ability to accurately express historically bound, contextual social facts relative to the agents holding those beliefs and the temporal period for which those beliefs were valid. The extension enables this expressivity by introducing the notions of institutional fact and speech act as core modelling concepts. Institutional facts are collective beliefs about the world held by groups for a period of time. Such collective beliefs while subjectively grounded are epistemically objective for the community over which they hold sway. Introducing the notion of institutional fact allows for a specialization of the core CRM to be able to express these social realities (expressed in simple, aoristic binary properties in the core CRM) in their full social complexity as temporally and socially bound beliefs. The concomitant core notion introduced in this extension is the idea of Speech Act in the Austinian and Serlean sense. A speech act is a kind of intentional event (E7 Activity of CRM base) in which agents purposefully apply a rule and perform a set practice in order to bring about a new social state or institutional fact. Introducing the notion of speech act provides both a high level ontological category and set of relations for describing the kinds of events which are the cause of institutional facts as well as providing a starting point for the analysis of the non truth propositional use of information objects. In speech acts, information objects (e.g. phrases and formulae) are deployed not to convey states of the world but to generate states of the world. The subject of historical investigation is not simply the bare facts available to an empirical analysis of the physical world but involves an investigation of the social activities which generated contexts of understanding and belief that may differ significantly across times and peoples. Materializing the social facts implicit in CRM base as explicit institutional facts gives them a richer ontological representation and offers a consistent epistemological approach to their study by recognizing social, negotiated facts as objective realities in themselves and treating them as first order entities of study. This involves a departure from the aims of CRM base which is guided by an information integration functionality which favours the representation of the latest state of knowledge in a presentist perspective. In the study of the history of art and architecture it is in no small part the different non-coinciding facts held or supported by different actors over different times which are of interest. The materialization of institutional facts supports the information management functionality which guides this informal extension of the CIDOC CRM and which aims to support historians in representing the positive knowledge they can gather from primary and secondary sources of evidence of both past simple and institutional facts for the purposes of proposing hypotheses and analyses of texts, authors, periods, works and so on. In this regard, CRMaaa also provides an initial limited set of classes for describing traditional and digital methods of deriving facts from texts, in order to support the linking of contemporary research processes as provenance nodes for the different data points of simple and institutional facts which they generate in the course of their research. With this in mind, examples have been chosen which potentially support a variety of social facts. Some of these facts, i.e., those held by one group of people at some time or other, may directly contradict another, i.e., that held by a different group of people at some potentially different time. Most of the examples have been reused across different types of social fact, in order to tell more completely the history of the objects in question and the beliefs that have been held about them by specific groups of people over a given period of time. These histories can in themselves be quite complex. References are thus provided for further contextualization. These appear in brackets following the examples, like so: The Ownership Status (ZE8) of the Gʼpsgolox totem pole (E22) as 'has current owner' the Haisla people (E74) from 1872 - 2012 holds for the Haisla people (E74) and as 'has current owner' the Swedish National Museum of Ethnography (E74) from 1929 - 2006 holds for the Swedish Polity. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%CA%BCpsgolox_totem_pole) This unofficial extension of the CIDOC CRM is formulated in relation to: CIDOC CRM v.7.1.2 CIDOC CRM Dig v.4.0 The specification consists of a set of declarations for formalized classes and properties that extend the CIDOC CRM and the above official extensions.  Adopting the conventions of the CIDOC CRM each class and property have been given an identifier in addition to their names. The naming convention adopted for this extension is: ZE = class ZP = property The choice of these names was arbitrary, making a conceptual connection with the official CRM representation while clearly distinguishing the new classes and properties from those of either CRM base or its official extensions. en WIP

Contributors

George Bruseker, Denitsa Nenova, Matthew Fielding

Identification

Base URI: https://takin.solutions/ontologies/crmaaa/

Project of belonging: CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation

Version info

1.5

Namespace published and available since: 2023-10-31

Namespaces to which this ongoing namespace refers

Namespace
CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2
CRMdig version 4.0
Referenced:

Labels

Label Language Last updated
CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 * 2023-10-31

* : Standard label for this language

Versions

CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 is a published namespace.

Root namespace: CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation

Ongoing namespace: CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5.1 ongoing

Other published versions

Namespace Publication date

Classes

Identifier Class Last updated
ZE14 Similarity Status 2023-10-31
ZE6 Social Status 2023-11-28
ZE7 Custodial Status 2023-11-28
ZE8 Ownership Status 2023-11-28
ZE9 Residential Status 2023-11-28
ZE12 Referential Status 2023-11-28
ZE20 Declarative Acquisition 2023-10-31
ZE22 Declarative Joining 2023-10-31
ZE27 Declaration of Obligation 2023-10-31
ZE30 Property Right Status 2023-10-31
ZE23 Declarative Leaving 2023-10-31
ZE15 Set Status 2023-10-31
ZE26 Dating Declaration 2023-10-31
ZE24 Notional Set 2023-10-31
ZE29 Transfer of Property Right 2023-10-31
ZE25 Dating Status 2023-10-31
ZE21 Declarative Transfer of Custody 2023-10-31
ZE28 Obligation Status 2023-10-31
ZE19 Naming 2023-10-31
ZE18 Critical Reading 2023-10-31
ZE33 Declarative Formation 2023-10-31
ZE3 Contact Point Status 2023-11-28
ZE10 Family Status 2023-11-28
ZE34 Declarative Dissolution 2023-10-31
ZE5 Function Status 2023-11-28
ZE4 Classificatory Status 2023-11-28
ZE1 Institutional Fact 2023-11-28
ZE13 Speech Act 2023-11-28
ZE2 Appellative Status 2023-11-28
ZE11 Membership Status 2023-11-28

Properties

Domain Domain namespace Identifier Property Range Range namespace Last updated
Set Status – ZE15 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP48 ascribes set (is set ascribed by) Notional Set – ZE24 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31
Speech Act – ZE13 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP52 intentionally terminated (was intentionally terminated by) Institutional Fact – ZE1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31
Similarity Status – ZE14 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP44 ascribes similarity target (is similarity target ascribed by) CRM Entity – E1 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Similarity Status – ZE14 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP43 has similarity subject (is similarity subject of) CRM Entity – E1 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Custodial Status – ZE7 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP22 ascribes custodial relation (is custodial relation ascribed by) Type – E55 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Speech Act – ZE13 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP41 uttered (was uttered by) Information Object – E73 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Speech Act – ZE13 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP40 performed (was performed by) Design or Procedure – E29 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Referential Status – ZE12 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP38 ascribes referential mode (is referential mode ascribed by) Type – E55 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Referential Status – ZE12 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP37 ascribes referential relation (is referential relation ascribed by) Type – E55 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Referential Status – ZE12 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP36 ascribes referent (is referent ascribed by) CRM Entity – E1 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Referential Status – ZE12 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP35 has referential subject (is referential subject of) Propositional Object – E89 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Membership Status – ZE11 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP34 ascribes membership relation (is membership relation ascribed by) Type – E55 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Membership Status – ZE11 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP33 ascribes group (is group ascribed by) Group – E74 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Family Status – ZE10 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP30 ascribes relative (is relative ascribed by) Person – E21 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Family Status – ZE10 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP29 has familial subject (is familial subject of) Person – E21 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Residential Status – ZE9 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP28 ascribes residence relation (is residence relation ascribed by) Type – E55 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Residential Status – ZE9 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP27 acribes residence place (is residence place ascribed by) Place – E53 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Residential Status – ZE9 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP26 has residence subject (is residence subject of) Actor – E39 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Ownership Status – ZE8 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP25 ascribes ownership relation (is ownership relation ascribed by) Type – E55 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Ownership Status – ZE8 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP24 ascribes owner (is owners ascribed by) Actor – E39 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Custodial Status – ZE7 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP21 ascribes custodian (is custodian ascribed by) Actor – E39 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Social Status – ZE6 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP19 ascribes social status relation (is social status relation ascribed by) Type – E55 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Social Status – ZE6 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP18 ascribes social status (is social status ascribed by) Type – E55 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Social Status – ZE6 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP17 has social status subject (is social status subject of) Actor – E39 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Function Status – ZE5 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP16 ascribes functional relation (is functional relation ascribed by) Type – E55 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Function Status – ZE5 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP15 ascribes function (is function ascribed by) Type – E55 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Classificatory Status – ZE4 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP13 ascribes classification relation (is classification relations ascribed by) Type – E55 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Classificatory Status – ZE4 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP12 ascribes classification (is classification ascribed by) Type – E55 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Classificatory Status – ZE4 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP11 has classificatory subject (is classificatory subject of) CRM Entity – E1 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Contact Point Status – ZE3 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP10 ascribes contact point relation (is contact point relation ascribed by) Type – E55 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Contact Point Status – ZE3 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP8 has contact point subject (is contact point subject of) Actor – E39 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Appellative Status – ZE2 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP7 ascribes appellative relation (is appellative relation ascribed by) Type – E55 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Appellative Status – ZE2 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP6 ascribes appellation (is appellation ascribed by) Appellation – E41 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Appellative Status – ZE2 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP5 has appellative subject (is appellative subject of) CRM Entity – E1 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Institutional Fact – ZE1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP4 holds for (holds) Group – E74 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Institutional Fact – ZE1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP3 ascribes intentional relation (is intentional relation ascribed by) Type – E55 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Institutional Fact – ZE1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP2 ascribes intentional target (is intentional target ascribed by) CRM Entity – E1 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Institutional Fact – ZE1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP1 has intentional subject (is intentional subject of) CRM Entity – E1 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Speech Act – ZE13 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP42 intentionally initiated (was intentionally initiated by) Institutional Fact – ZE1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31
Institutional Fact – ZE1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP76 applies for context type (is context type for) Type – E55 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Contact Point Status – ZE3 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP9 ascribes contact point (is contact point ascribed by) Identifier – E42 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Institutional Fact – ZE1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP75 applies for context (is context for) Event – E5 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Ownership Status – ZE8 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP23 has ownership subject (is ownership subject of) Physical Thing – E18 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Speech Act – ZE13 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP74 terminated institutional fact for (had institutional fact terminated by) Group – E74 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Custodial Status – ZE7 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP20 has custodial subject (is custodial subject of) Physical Thing – E18 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Function Status – ZE5 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP14 has functional subject (is functional subject of) CRM Entity – E1 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Declaration of Obligation – ZE27 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP69 generated obligation of (had obligation generated of by) Dimension – E54 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Declaration of Obligation – ZE27 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP68 generated obligation to (had obligation to generated by) Actor – E39 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Declaration of Obligation – ZE27 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP67 generated obligation upon (had obligation generated upon by) Actor – E39 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Speech Act – ZE13 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP53 initiated institutional fact for (had institutional fact initiated by) Group – E74 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Obligation Status – ZE28 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP58 ascribes debtor (is debtor ascribed by) Actor – E39 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Property Right Status – ZE30 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP65 ascribes property right holder (is property right holder ascribed by) Actor – E39 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Property Right Status – ZE30 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP64 has property right subject (is property right subject of) Legal Object – E72 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Obligation Status – ZE28 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP59 ascribes obligation relation (is obligation relation ascribed by) Type – E55 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Obligation Status – ZE28 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP60 ascribes debtee (is debtee ascribed by) Actor – E39 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Obligation Status – ZE28 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP57 has obligation subject (is obligation subject of) Dimension – E54 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Dating Status – ZE25 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP56 ascribes dating relation (is dating relation ascibed by) Type – E55 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Dating Status – ZE25 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP54 ascribes relative date (is relative date ascribed by) Period – E4 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Dating Status – ZE25 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP55 has dating subject (is dating subject of) Period – E4 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Transfer of Property Right – ZE29 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP63 transferred property right over (had change in property right through) Legal Object – E72 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Transfer of Property Right – ZE29 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP62 transferred property right from (surrendered property right through) Actor – E39 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Transfer of Property Right – ZE29 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP61 transferred property right to (acquired property right through) Actor – E39 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Set Status – ZE15 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP49 ascribes set belonging relation (is set belonging relation ascribed by) Type – E55 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Notional Set – ZE24 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP51 has former or current set member (is current or former set member of) CRM Entity – E1 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Set Status – ZE15 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP47 has set belonging subject (is set belonging subject of) CRM Entity – E1 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Similarity Status – ZE14 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP46 ascribes similarity mode (is similarity mode ascribed by) Type – E55 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Similarity Status – ZE14 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP45 ascribes similarity relation (is similarity relation ascribed by) Type – E55 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Family Status – ZE10 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP31 ascribes familial relation (is familial relation ascribed by) Type – E55 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Membership Status – ZE11 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP32 has membership subject (is membership subject of) Actor – E39 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Property Right Status – ZE30 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP66 ascribes property right relation (is property right relation ascribed by) Type – E55 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31
Social Status – ZE6 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 ZP70 ascribes social status in relation to (is related to held social status) Actor – E39 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31

Relations

Filter by

Source Source namespace Relation Target Target namespace Last updated Type
Appellative Status – ZE2 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Institutional Fact – ZE1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Function Status – ZE5 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Classificatory Status – ZE4 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Social Status – ZE6 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Classificatory Status – ZE4 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Residential Status – ZE9 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Institutional Fact – ZE1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Family Status – ZE10 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Institutional Fact – ZE1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Membership Status – ZE11 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Institutional Fact – ZE1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Referential Status – ZE12 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Institutional Fact – ZE1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Contact Point Status – ZE3 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Appellative Status – ZE2 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Classificatory Status – ZE4 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Institutional Fact – ZE1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Custodial Status – ZE7 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Property Right Status – ZE30 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Declarative Formation – ZE33 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Speech Act – ZE13 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Declarative Dissolution – ZE34 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Speech Act – ZE13 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Declarative Dissolution – ZE34 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Dissolution – E68 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Declarative Transfer of Custody – ZE21 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Transfer of Property Right – ZE29 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Ownership Status – ZE8 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Property Right Status – ZE30 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Similarity Status – ZE14 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Institutional Fact – ZE1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Set Status – ZE15 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Institutional Fact – ZE1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Declaration of Obligation – ZE27 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Speech Act – ZE13 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Critical Reading – ZE18 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Speech Act – ZE13 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Declarative Acquisition – ZE20 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Transfer of Property Right – ZE29 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Declarative Joining – ZE22 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Speech Act – ZE13 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Obligation Status – ZE28 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Institutional Fact – ZE1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Dating Status – ZE25 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Institutional Fact – ZE1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Property Right Status – ZE30 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Institutional Fact – ZE1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Dating Declaration – ZE26 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Speech Act – ZE13 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Notional Set – ZE24 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Conceptual Object – E28 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Transfer of Property Right – ZE29 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Speech Act – ZE13 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Institutional Fact – ZE1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Temporal Entity – E2 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Speech Act – ZE13 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Activity – E7 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Naming – ZE19 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Attribute Assignment – E13 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Declarative Acquisition – ZE20 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Acquisition – E8 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Declarative Transfer of Custody – ZE21 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Transfer of Custody – E10 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Declarative Joining – ZE22 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Joining – E85 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Declarative Leaving – ZE23 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Leaving – E86 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
Declarative Formation – ZE33 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subClassOf Formation – E66 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31 ClassesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
generated obligation to (had obligation to generated by) – ZP68 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf carried out by (performed) – P14 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
generated obligation upon (had obligation generated upon by) – ZP67 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf carried out by (performed) – P14 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
transferred property right over (had change in property right through) – ZP63 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf used specific object (was used for) – P16 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
transferred property right from (surrendered property right through) – ZP62 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf carried out by (performed) – P14 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
transferred property right to (acquired property right through) – ZP61 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf carried out by (performed) – P14 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
uttered (was uttered by) – ZP41 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf used specific object (was used for) – P16 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
performed (was performed by) – ZP40 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf used specific technique (was used by) – P33 CIDOC CRM version 7.1.2 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
acribes residence place (is residence place ascribed by) – ZP27 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes intentional target (is intentional target ascribed by) – ZP2 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
has referential subject (is referential subject of) – ZP35 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf has intentional subject (is intentional subject of) – ZP1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes referent (is referent ascribed by) – ZP36 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes intentional target (is intentional target ascribed by) – ZP2 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
has appellative subject (is appellative subject of) – ZP5 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf has intentional subject (is intentional subject of) – ZP1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes appellation (is appellation ascribed by) – ZP6 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes intentional target (is intentional target ascribed by) – ZP2 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes appellative relation (is appellative relation ascribed by) – ZP7 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes intentional relation (is intentional relation ascribed by) – ZP3 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
has classificatory subject (is classificatory subject of) – ZP11 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf has intentional subject (is intentional subject of) – ZP1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes classification (is classification ascribed by) – ZP12 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes intentional target (is intentional target ascribed by) – ZP2 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes classification relation (is classification relations ascribed by) – ZP13 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes intentional relation (is intentional relation ascribed by) – ZP3 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
has functional subject (is functional subject of) – ZP14 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf has classificatory subject (is classificatory subject of) – ZP11 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes functional relation (is functional relation ascribed by) – ZP16 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes classification relation (is classification relations ascribed by) – ZP13 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes function (is function ascribed by) – ZP15 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes classification (is classification ascribed by) – ZP12 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes social status relation (is social status relation ascribed by) – ZP19 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes classification relation (is classification relations ascribed by) – ZP13 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes social status (is social status ascribed by) – ZP18 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes classification (is classification ascribed by) – ZP12 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
has social status subject (is social status subject of) – ZP17 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf has classificatory subject (is classificatory subject of) – ZP11 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
has custodial subject (is custodial subject of) – ZP20 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf has intentional subject (is intentional subject of) – ZP1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes custodian (is custodian ascribed by) – ZP21 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes intentional target (is intentional target ascribed by) – ZP2 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes custodial relation (is custodial relation ascribed by) – ZP22 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes intentional relation (is intentional relation ascribed by) – ZP3 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
has ownership subject (is ownership subject of) – ZP23 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf has intentional subject (is intentional subject of) – ZP1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes owner (is owners ascribed by) – ZP24 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes intentional target (is intentional target ascribed by) – ZP2 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes ownership relation (is ownership relation ascribed by) – ZP25 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes intentional relation (is intentional relation ascribed by) – ZP3 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
has familial subject (is familial subject of) – ZP29 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf has intentional subject (is intentional subject of) – ZP1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes relative (is relative ascribed by) – ZP30 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes intentional target (is intentional target ascribed by) – ZP2 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes familial relation (is familial relation ascribed by) – ZP31 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes intentional relation (is intentional relation ascribed by) – ZP3 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
has membership subject (is membership subject of) – ZP32 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf has intentional subject (is intentional subject of) – ZP1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes group (is group ascribed by) – ZP33 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes intentional target (is intentional target ascribed by) – ZP2 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes membership relation (is membership relation ascribed by) – ZP34 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes intentional relation (is intentional relation ascribed by) – ZP3 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
has contact point subject (is contact point subject of) – ZP8 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf has appellative subject (is appellative subject of) – ZP5 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes contact point (is contact point ascribed by) – ZP9 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes appellation (is appellation ascribed by) – ZP6 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes contact point relation (is contact point relation ascribed by) – ZP10 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes appellative relation (is appellative relation ascribed by) – ZP7 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes referential relation (is referential relation ascribed by) – ZP37 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes intentional relation (is intentional relation ascribed by) – ZP3 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes residence relation (is residence relation ascribed by) – ZP28 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes intentional relation (is intentional relation ascribed by) – ZP3 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes similarity target (is similarity target ascribed by) – ZP44 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes intentional target (is intentional target ascribed by) – ZP2 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes similarity relation (is similarity relation ascribed by) – ZP45 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes intentional relation (is intentional relation ascribed by) – ZP3 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
has set belonging subject (is set belonging subject of) – ZP47 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf has intentional subject (is intentional subject of) – ZP1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes set (is set ascribed by) – ZP48 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes intentional target (is intentional target ascribed by) – ZP2 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
has similarity subject (is similarity subject of) – ZP43 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf has intentional subject (is intentional subject of) – ZP1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes set belonging relation (is set belonging relation ascribed by) – ZP49 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes intentional relation (is intentional relation ascribed by) – ZP3 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
has obligation subject (is obligation subject of) – ZP57 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf has intentional subject (is intentional subject of) – ZP1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes debtor (is debtor ascribed by) – ZP58 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes intentional target (is intentional target ascribed by) – ZP2 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes debtee (is debtee ascribed by) – ZP60 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes intentional target (is intentional target ascribed by) – ZP2 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes obligation relation (is obligation relation ascribed by) – ZP59 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes intentional relation (is intentional relation ascribed by) – ZP3 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes relative date (is relative date ascribed by) – ZP54 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes intentional target (is intentional target ascribed by) – ZP2 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
has dating subject (is dating subject of) – ZP55 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf has intentional subject (is intentional subject of) – ZP1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
has property right subject (is property right subject of) – ZP64 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf has intentional subject (is intentional subject of) – ZP1 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes property right holder (is property right holder ascribed by) – ZP65 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes intentional target (is intentional target ascribed by) – ZP2 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation
ascribes property right relation (is property right relation ascribed by) – ZP66 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 rdfs:subPropertyOf ascribes intentional relation (is intentional relation ascribed by) – ZP3 CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 2023-10-31 PropertiesRelation-HierarchyAssociation

Notes

Show Note Type Language Entity

Comments

List of mismatches with reference namespaces

Entities listed here are not correctly associated with your reference namespaces. They are displayed in red in your ongoing namespace. They may not be available in the version of the selected space. Or you may not have selected any version of a reference namespace.
Please make the necessary corrections before proceeding.

Type of relation Entity Namespace Error type