performed (was performed by) – ZP40
Validation status: Validated
ZP40 performed (was performed by)
Domain:
Range:
Quantification:
No quantifiers yet.
Subproperty of:
Scope note:
This property is used to indicate the performance plan sanctioned by normative rule appealed to by a symbolic act in order to bring out the specific intended communicative affect. At a general level, the performance plan is what is appealed to in order to carry out the symbolic act in the first place. For example, an act of defiance may call on a specific sequence of gestures to be instantiated.
The case of speech act (ZE13) is a special case of symbolic act where the performance plan indicates the series of necessary procedures that must be followed in order for the speech act to have been successfully carried out and to have created a genuine instance of the institutional fact that it was designed to make possible.
Examples:
- Michael Leshner (E21) and Michael Stark (E21) performed the marriage ceremony (E29) in their 2003 wedding in Toronto, Ontario. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Leshner_and_Michael_Stark)
- Father Andres Arango's baptisms (ZE13) performed the Catholic Right of Baptism (E29) (https://www.cbc.ca/radio/asithappens/as-it-happens-the-thursday-edition-1.6355198/thousands-of-baptisms-declared-invalid-in-arizona-because-of-a-single-word-1.6355339)
In First Order Logic:
- ZP40(x,y) ⇒ ZE53(x)
- ZP40(x,y) ⇒ E29(y)
- ZP40(x,y) ⇒ P33(x,y)
Scope notes
Show | Scope note | Language | Namespace | View details | Comments | Validation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This property is used to indicate the performance plan sanctioned by normative rule appealed to by a symbolic act in order to bring out the specific intended communicative affect. At a general level, the performance plan is what is appealed to in order to carry out the symbolic act in the first place. For example, an act of defiance may call on a specific sequence of gestures to be instantiated. The case of speech act (ZE13) is a special case of symbolic act where the performance plan indicates the series of necessary procedures that must be followed in order for the speech act to have been successfully carried out and to have created a genuine instance of the institutional fact that it was designed to make possible. | en | Art and Architectural Argumentation Ontology Version 1.6 ongoing | 0 | Validated |
Examples
Show | Example | Language | Namespace | View details | Comments | Validation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Michael Leshner (E21) and Michael Stark (E21) performed the marriage ceremony (E29) in their 2003 wedding in Toronto, Ontario. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Leshner_and_Michael_Stark) Father Andres Arango's baptisms (ZE13) performed the Catholic Right of Baptism (E29) (https://www.cbc.ca/radio/asithappens/as-it-happens-the-thursday-edition-1.6355198/thousands-of-baptisms-declared-invalid-in-arizona-because-of-a-single-word-1.6355339) | en | Art and Architectural Argumentation Ontology Version 1.6 ongoing | 0 | Validation request |
Additional notes
Show | Notes | Type | Language | Namespace | View details | Comments | Validation |
---|
Identifier: ZP40
Official URI: https://ontology.swissartresearch.net/aaao/ZP40_performed
OntoME URI: https://ontome.net/ontology/p1735
Domain and range
aaao:ZE53 Symbolic Act → ZP40 performed (was performed by) → crm:E29 Design or Procedure
Labels
Label | Language | Last updated | View details | Comments | Validation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
performed (was performed by) | en | 2024-10-18 | 0 | Validated |
: Standard label for this language
Namespace
Namespace | Last updated |
---|---|
Art and Architectural Argumentation Ontology Version 1.6 ongoing | 2020-09-18 |
CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5.4 | 2024-06-24 |
CRM for Art and Architectural Argumentation Version 1.5 | 2023-10-31 |
Parent properties
Domain | Property | Range | Property namespace | Relation defined in | Justification | View details | Edit | Delete | Comments | Validation | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
crm:E7 Activity | (0,n) | P33 used specific technique (was used by) | (0,n) | crm:E29 Design or Procedure | CIDOC CRM version 7.1.3 | Art and Architectural Argumentation Ontology Version 1.6 ongoing |
|
0 | Validated |
Ancestor properties
Domain | Property | Range | Depth | Property namespace | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
crm:E5 Event | (0,n) | P12 occurred in the presence of (was present at) | (1,n) | crm:E77 Persistent Item | 3 | CIDOC CRM version 7.1.3 |
crm:E7 Activity | (0,n) | P15 was influenced by (influenced) | (0,n) | crm:E1 CRM Entity | 3 | CIDOC CRM version 7.1.3 |
crm:E7 Activity | (0,n) | P16 used specific object (was used for) | (0,n) | crm:E70 Thing | 2 | CIDOC CRM version 7.1.3 |
Child and descendant properties
Domain | Property | Range | Depth | Property namespace |
---|
Related properties
Relation | Property | Property namespace | Relation defined in | Justification | View details | Edit | Delete | Comments | Validation |
---|
Profiles using this property
Label | Version | Status | Last updated |
---|
Comments
No comment found.