CRMInfluence draft v2 ongoing
DOCX export options
Quantification
First Order Logic
Example of what will be added to the properties in the document
Quantification:
In First Order Logic:
one to many (0,n:0,1)
P1(x,y) ⇒ C1(x)
P1(x,y) ⇒ C2(y)
P1(x,y) ⇒ P2(x,y)
CRMInfluence draft v2 ongoing
Description:
A multi-causal ontology model - part of the CIDOC-CRM ontology family.
Status:
Reference namespace:
Contributors:
Description
Description
A multi-causal ontology model - part of the CIDOC-CRM ontology family.
Contributors
Martin Doerr, Dominic Oldman CandidateIdentification
Base URI: http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/influence/
Project of belonging: CRMInfluence
This namespace is ongoing and can be modified at any time. It is not advisable to use its classes and properties.
Namespace published and available since: 2024-02-21
Namespace to which this ongoing namespace refers
Namespace |
---|
CIDOC CRM version 7.1.3 |
Labels
Label | Language | Last updated | Validation |
---|---|---|---|
CRMInfluence draft v2 ongoing * | en | 2024-04-05 | Candidate |
* : Standard label for this language
Versions
CRMInfluence draft v2 ongoing is an ongoing namespace.
Root namespace: CRMInfluence. A multi-causal ontology model - part of the CIDOC-CRM ontology family
Published versions
Classes
Identifier | Class | Last updated | Validation status |
---|---|---|---|
EC74 | Communicative Group | 2024-04-04 | Candidate |
IN32 | Communicative Influence | 2024-04-04 | Candidate |
IN35 | Environmental Influence | 2024-04-04 | Candidate |
EO2 | Event Pattern | 2024-04-04 | Candidate |
IN31 | Individual Influence | 2024-04-04 | Candidate |
IN30 | Influence | 2024-04-04 | Candidate |
IN34 | Inner Influence | 2024-04-04 | Candidate |
MO1 | Mental Attitude | 2024-04-04 | Candidate |
MO2 | Mental Process | 2024-04-04 | Candidate |
IN36 | Observable Situation | 2024-04-04 | Candidate |
MO3 | Observable Situation | 2024-04-04 | Candidate |
EO1 | Situation Type | 2024-04-04 | Candidate |
IN33 | Societal Influence | 2024-04-04 | Candidate |
Properties
Relations
Filter by
Source | Relation | Target | Last updated |
---|---|---|---|
Communicative Group – EC74 | rdfs:subClassOf | Group – E74 | 2024-04-04 |
Communicative Influence – IN32 | rdfs:subClassOf | Influence – IN30 | 2024-04-04 |
Environmental Influence – IN35 | rdfs:subClassOf | Influence – IN30 | 2024-04-04 |
Event Pattern – EO2 | rdfs:subClassOf | Situation Type – EO1 | 2024-04-04 |
Individual Influence – IN31 | rdfs:subClassOf | Influence – IN30 | 2024-04-04 |
Influence – IN30 | rdfs:subClassOf | Mental Attitude – MO1 | 2024-04-04 |
Inner Influence – IN34 | rdfs:subClassOf | Influence – IN30 | 2024-04-04 |
Mental Attitude – MO1 | rdfs:subClassOf | Temporal Entity – E2 | 2024-04-04 |
Mental Process – MO2 | rdfs:subClassOf | Temporal Entity – E2 | 2024-04-04 |
Observable Situation – IN36 | rdfs:subClassOf | Temporal Entity – E2 | 2024-04-04 |
Observable Situation – MO3 | rdfs:subClassOf | Temporal Entity – E2 | 2024-04-04 |
Situation Type – EO1 | rdfs:subClassOf | Type – E55 | 2024-04-04 |
Societal Influence – IN33 | rdfs:subClassOf | Influence – IN30 | 2024-04-04 |
Notes
Context note
Please note that in the model documentation, the range of this property is either crmflu:EC74 Communicative Group or crm:E21 Person.
As it is not possible in OntoME to have two ranges for a property, the choice on import was made to use the common class immediately above, i.e. crm:E39 Actor.
Here is an extract from the documentation:
Influence on collective actors:
As a first idea, let us consider a Group in the sense of the CRM, which can act as an individual, in contrast to a mass limited by parameters. Then evidence may just be sought in their common or representative activities and products. However, in order to argue about an influence common to identifiable collectives of people we should exclude groups which are led by representatives, such as large enterprises, institutions and nations. We have to assume that groups capable of acting as an individual under the same identifiable individual influence have a sort of shared understanding prior to acting by definition, broadly a shared mental attitude. Such shared understanding should normally be the result of communication among its members, characteristic for teams, and generally limiting the size of participants.
For a mass of people, certain professions or religious confessions, social classes, we need to take a rather statistical stance, which is not part of the model, in which influence is an interpretation of a potential based on varied evidence from individuals or clearly collaborating groups. The model presented here aims at providing the empirical base and the means to document the necessary provenance of knowledge for arguing at such a collective level without falling into the traps of hidden epistemological biases of statistical arguments, well-described in respective literature, not to talk about intentional distortion of reality. To provide this differentiation a new class, EC74 Communicative Group is created which creates the necessary specialisation. For the time being, we use EC74 Communicative Group OR E21 Person as the range of the respective properties. A tentative “Communicative Actor” class may be introduced later to replace this construct adequately.
Context note
Please note that in the model documentation, the range of this property is either crmflu:EC74 Communicative Group or crm:E21 Person.
As it is not possible in OntoME to have two ranges for a property, the choice on import was made to use the common class immediately above, i.e. crm:E39 Actor.
Here is an extract from the documentation:
Influence on collective actors:
As a first idea, let us consider a Group in the sense of the CRM, which can act as an individual, in contrast to a mass limited by parameters. Then evidence may just be sought in their common or representative activities and products. However, in order to argue about an influence common to identifiable collectives of people we should exclude groups which are led by representatives, such as large enterprises, institutions and nations. We have to assume that groups capable of acting as an individual under the same identifiable individual influence have a sort of shared understanding prior to acting by definition, broadly a shared mental attitude. Such shared understanding should normally be the result of communication among its members, characteristic for teams, and generally limiting the size of participants.
For a mass of people, certain professions or religious confessions, social classes, we need to take a rather statistical stance, which is not part of the model, in which influence is an interpretation of a potential based on varied evidence from individuals or clearly collaborating groups. The model presented here aims at providing the empirical base and the means to document the necessary provenance of knowledge for arguing at such a collective level without falling into the traps of hidden epistemological biases of statistical arguments, well-described in respective literature, not to talk about intentional distortion of reality. To provide this differentiation a new class, EC74 Communicative Group is created which creates the necessary specialisation. For the time being, we use EC74 Communicative Group OR E21 Person as the range of the respective properties. A tentative “Communicative Actor” class may be introduced later to replace this construct adequately.
Show | Note | Type | Language | Entity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Please note that in the model documentation, the range of this property is either crmflu:EC74 Communicative Group or crm:E21 Person. As it is not possible in OntoME to have two ranges for a property, the choice on import was made to use the common class immediately above, i.e. crm:E39 Actor. Here is an extract from the documentation: Influence on collective actors: As a first idea, let us consider a Group in the sense of the CRM, which can act as an individual, in contrast to a mass limited by parameters. Then evidence may just be sought in their common or representative activities and products. However, in order to argue about an influence common to identifiable collectives of people we should exclude groups which are led by representatives, such as large enterprises, institutions and nations. We have to assume that groups capable of acting as an individual under the same identifiable individual influence have a sort of shared understanding prior to acting by definition, broadly a shared mental attitude. Such shared understanding should normally be the result of communication among its members, characteristic for teams, and generally limiting the size of participants. For a mass of people, certain professions or religious confessions, social classes, we need to take a rather statistical stance, which is not part of the model, in which influence is an interpretation of a potential based on varied evidence from individuals or clearly collaborating groups. The model presented here aims at providing the empirical base and the means to document the necessary provenance of knowledge for arguing at such a collective level without falling into the traps of hidden epistemological biases of statistical arguments, well-described in respective literature, not to talk about intentional distortion of reality. To provide this differentiation a new class, EC74 Communicative Group is created which creates the necessary specialisation. For the time being, we use EC74 Communicative Group OR E21 Person as the range of the respective properties. A tentative “Communicative Actor” class may be introduced later to replace this construct adequately. | Context note | en | crmflu:IP56 was exerted by (generated) | |
Please note that in the model documentation, the range of this property is either crmflu:EC74 Communicative Group or crm:E21 Person. As it is not possible in OntoME to have two ranges for a property, the choice on import was made to use the common class immediately above, i.e. crm:E39 Actor. Here is an extract from the documentation: Influence on collective actors: As a first idea, let us consider a Group in the sense of the CRM, which can act as an individual, in contrast to a mass limited by parameters. Then evidence may just be sought in their common or representative activities and products. However, in order to argue about an influence common to identifiable collectives of people we should exclude groups which are led by representatives, such as large enterprises, institutions and nations. We have to assume that groups capable of acting as an individual under the same identifiable individual influence have a sort of shared understanding prior to acting by definition, broadly a shared mental attitude. Such shared understanding should normally be the result of communication among its members, characteristic for teams, and generally limiting the size of participants. For a mass of people, certain professions or religious confessions, social classes, we need to take a rather statistical stance, which is not part of the model, in which influence is an interpretation of a potential based on varied evidence from individuals or clearly collaborating groups. The model presented here aims at providing the empirical base and the means to document the necessary provenance of knowledge for arguing at such a collective level without falling into the traps of hidden epistemological biases of statistical arguments, well-described in respective literature, not to talk about intentional distortion of reality. To provide this differentiation a new class, EC74 Communicative Group is created which creates the necessary specialisation. For the time being, we use EC74 Communicative Group OR E21 Person as the range of the respective properties. A tentative “Communicative Actor” class may be introduced later to replace this construct adequately. | Context note | en | crmflu:IP50 has influenced (has influenced) |
List of mismatches with reference namespaces
Entities listed here are not correctly associated with your reference namespaces.
They are displayed in red in your ongoing namespace. They may not be available in the version of the selected space.
Or you may not have selected any version of a reference namespace.
Please make the necessary corrections before proceeding.
Comments
No comment found.