Power, War, Religion and Relations Ontology ongoing

Power, War, Religion and Relations Ontology ongoing

Description:

Extending the Art and Archictectural Argumentation Ontology (AAAo), this project builds a set of classes and relations that enable the modelling of historical information pertaining to the exercise of power, the practice of religion, and the maintenance of social relations through communcative acts.

Compatibility and Nomenclature
This unofficial extension of the CIDOC CRM is formulated in relation to:

CRM 7.1.3
LRMoo 1.0
CRMsci 2.0
AAAo 1.6 ongoing

The specification consists of a set of declarations for formalized classes and properties that extend the CIDOC CRM and the above official extensions. 

Adopting the conventions of the CIDOC CRM each class and property have been given an identifier in addition to their names. The naming convention adopted for this extension is:

WE = class
WP = property

The choice of these names was arbitrary, making a conceptual connection with the official CRM representation while clearly distinguishing the new classes and properties from those of either CRM base or its official extensions.

Namespace: ****************************

Maintenance and Archiving
PWRo is an actively maintained ontology. It is our aim to develop publicly and participatively, learning from and engaging with the scholarly community that adopts it. Towards this end we maintain the ontology with the following processes and relative tools.

Ontology Development
We adopt the OntoMe tool developed by LARHRA to manage the ontology and produce editions. This ensures a consistent management of the ontology and provides a public space to engage in revisions.

The maintenace space for the ontology can be found here: https://ontome.net/project/208

Please note, at time of publishing, OntoME is not capable of producing complete, provenanced RDF serializations, so please only use the official RDF for this standard stored on our github. See below. 

Acknowledgements
The initiative for creating, developing and maintaining this ontology is made possible by important on-going funding and institutional commitment, which is gratefully acknowledged here.

Funding Support:***************************

Institutional Support:************************

Status:

Ongoing

Contributors:

George Bruseker, Matthew Fielding, Denitsa Nenova, Rocio Jimenez

Description

Show Description Language Validation
Extending the Art and Archictectural Argumentation Ontology (AAAo), this project builds a set of classes and relations that enable the modelling of historical information pertaining to the exercise of power, the practice of religion, and the maintenance of social relations through communcative acts.Compatibility and NomenclatureThis unofficial extension of the CIDOC CRM is formulated in relation to:CRM 7.1.3LRMoo 1.0CRMsci 2.0AAAo 1.6 ongoingThe specification consists of a set of declarations for formalized classes and properties that extend the CIDOC CRM and the above official extensions. Adopting the conventions of the CIDOC CRM each class and property have been given an identifier in addition to their names. The naming convention adopted for this extension is:WE = classWP = propertyThe choice of these names was arbitrary, making a conceptual connection with the official CRM representation while clearly distinguishing the new classes and properties from those of either CRM base or its official extensions.Namespace: ****************************Maintenance and ArchivingPWRo is an actively maintained ontology. It is our aim to develop publicly and participatively, learning from and engaging with the scholarly community that adopts it. Towards this end we maintain the ontology with the following processes and relative tools.Ontology DevelopmentWe adopt the OntoMe tool developed by LARHRA to manage the ontology and produce editions. This ensures a consistent management of the ontology and provides a public space to engage in revisions.The maintenace space for the ontology can be found here: https://ontome.net/project/208Please note, at time of publishing, OntoME is not capable of producing complete, provenanced RDF serializations, so please only use the official RDF for this standard stored on our github. See below. AcknowledgementsThe initiative for creating, developing and maintaining this ontology is made possible by important on-going funding and institutional commitment, which is gratefully acknowledged here.Funding Support:***************************Institutional Support:************************ en Under revision

Contributors

George Bruseker, Matthew Fielding, Denitsa Nenova, Rocio Jimenez Validated

Identification

Base URI: https://ontology.swissartresearch.net/pwro

Project of belonging: Power, War, Religion and Relations Ontology

This namespace is ongoing and can be modified at any time. It is not advisable to use its classes and properties.

Namespaces to which this ongoing namespace refers

Namespace
CIDOC CRM version 7.1.3
Art and Architectural Argumentation Ontology Version 1.6 ongoing
Referenced:
CRMsci version 2.0
Referenced:
LRMoo 1.0
Referenced:

Labels

Label Language Last updated Validation
Power, War, Religion and Relations Ontology ongoing * en 2024-11-25 Validated

* : Standard label for this language

Versions

Power, War, Religion and Relations Ontology ongoing is an ongoing namespace.

Root namespace: Power, War, Religion and Relations Ontology

Published versions

Namespace Publication date

Classes

The classes in this ongoing namespace are currently only visible to members of the Power, War, Religion and Relations Ontology project.

Properties

The properties in this ongoing namespace are currently only visible to members of the Power, War, Religion and Relations Ontology project.

Relations

The relations in this ongoing namespace are currently only visible to members of the Power, War, Religion and Relations Ontology project.

Notes

Show Note Type Language Entity

Graph

This graph of an ongoing namespace is currently only visible to members of the Power, War, Religion and Relations Ontology project.

Comments

List of mismatches with reference namespaces

Entities listed here are not correctly associated with your reference namespaces. They are displayed in red in your ongoing namespace. They may not be available in the version of the selected space. Or you may not have selected any version of a reference namespace.
Please make the necessary corrections before proceeding.

Type of relation Entity Namespace Error type