was exerted by (generated) – IP56

This property does not yet have the minimum number of validated parts required for publication.

IP56 was exerted by (generated)

Quantification:

No quantifiers yet.

Scope note:

Examples:

No example yet.

Context notes:

Please note that in the model documentation, the range of this property is either crmflu:EC74 Communicative Group or crm:E21 Person.

As it is not possible in OntoME to have two ranges for a property, the choice on import was made to use the common class immediately above, i.e. crm:E39 Actor.

Here is an extract from the documentation:

Influence on collective actors:

As a first idea, let us consider a Group in the sense of the CRM, which can act as an individual, in contrast to a mass limited by parameters. Then evidence may just be sought in their common or representative activities and products. However, in order to argue about an influence common to identifiable collectives of people we should exclude groups which are led by representatives, such as large enterprises, institutions and nations. We have to assume that groups capable of acting as an individual under the same identifiable individual influence have a sort of shared understanding prior to acting by definition, broadly a shared mental attitude. Such shared understanding should normally be the result of communication among its members, characteristic for teams, and generally limiting the size of participants.

For a mass of people, certain professions or religious confessions, social classes, we need to take a rather statistical stance, which is not part of the model, in which influence is an interpretation of a potential based on varied evidence from individuals or clearly collaborating groups. The model presented here aims at providing the empirical base and the means to document the necessary provenance of knowledge for arguing at such a collective level without falling into the traps of hidden epistemological biases of statistical arguments, well-described in respective literature, not to talk about intentional distortion of reality. To provide this differentiation a new class, EC74 Communicative Group is created which creates the necessary specialisation. For the time being, we use EC74 Communicative Group OR E21 Person as the range of the respective properties. A tentative “Communicative Actor” class may be introduced later to replace this construct adequately.

In First Order Logic:

  • IP56(x,y) ⇒ IN32(x)
  • IP56(x,y) ⇒ E39(y)

Scope notes

Show Scope note Language Namespace View details Comments Validation
en CRMInfluence draft v2 ongoing 0 Candidate

Examples

Show Example Language Namespace View details Comments Validation

Additional notes

Show Notes Type Language Namespace View details Comments Validation
Please note that in the model documentation, the range of this property is either crmflu:EC74 Communicative Group or crm:E21 Person. As it is not possible in OntoME to have two ranges for a property, the choice on import was made to use the common class immediately above, i.e. crm:E39 Actor. Here is an extract from the documentation: Influence on collective actors: As a first idea, let us consider a Group in the sense of the CRM, which can act as an individual, in contrast to a mass limited by parameters. Then evidence may just be sought in their common or representative activities and products. However, in order to argue about an influence common to identifiable collectives of people we should exclude groups which are led by representatives, such as large enterprises, institutions and nations. We have to assume that groups capable of acting as an individual under the same identifiable individual influence have a sort of shared understanding prior to acting by definition, broadly a shared mental attitude. Such shared understanding should normally be the result of communication among its members, characteristic for teams, and generally limiting the size of participants. For a mass of people, certain professions or religious confessions, social classes, we need to take a rather statistical stance, which is not part of the model, in which influence is an interpretation of a potential based on varied evidence from individuals or clearly collaborating groups. The model presented here aims at providing the empirical base and the means to document the necessary provenance of knowledge for arguing at such a collective level without falling into the traps of hidden epistemological biases of statistical arguments, well-described in respective literature, not to talk about intentional distortion of reality. To provide this differentiation a new class, EC74 Communicative Group is created which creates the necessary specialisation. For the time being, we use EC74 Communicative Group OR E21 Person as the range of the respective properties. A tentative “Communicative Actor” class may be introduced later to replace this construct adequately. Context note en CRMInfluence draft v2 ongoing 0 Candidate

Identifier: IP56

Official URI: http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/influence/IP56_was_exerted_by
OntoME URI: https://ontome.net/ontology/p2423

Domain and range

crmflu:IN32 Communicative Influence → IP56 was exerted by (generated) → crm:E39 Actor

Labels

Label Language Last updated View details Comments Validation
was exerted by (generated) * en 2024-04-04 0 Candidate

: Standard label for this language

Namespace

Namespace Last updated
CRMInfluence draft v2 ongoing 2024-04-04

Parent properties

Domain Property Range Property namespace Relation defined in Justification View details Edit Delete Comments Validation

Ancestor properties

Domain Property Range Depth Property namespace

Child and descendant properties

Domain Property Range Depth Property namespace

Related properties

Relation Property Property namespace Relation defined in Justification View details Edit Delete Comments Validation

Profiles using this property

Label Version Status Last updated

Comments